23 (porno thoughts)

November 22, 2010

Was thinking about porn and the types of things i like to see (or draw/paint/shoot), and trying to figure out what they all have in common.

Looking thru video and picture downloads, i see a lot of *activity.* Pictures are typically moments captured and are of people doing something. Videos are not typically of photoshoots (though those have their own merit), but what usually stands the test of time on my hard drive and favorites lists are of dancing and of course, sex. Out of these two, dancing tends to last longer in my archives.

Sex in porn is way too easy. Compared to dancing, in my opinion, it doesn’t really take any talent. Or rather, it doesn’t take any talent to FILM it (we all know it takes talent to fuck with any kind of decency). Filming dancing is difficult, because unlike fucking, you usually can’t just have a camera in a static position, put someone in front of it and have them dance, and have it look interesting. Doesn’t matter how naked they get in the process, if the camera is just sitting there at a boring angle, the whole thing is boring. This goes double if the person is trying to do a sexy dance. I’ve noticed that a lot of the time what people call a sexy dance is just random gyrating with no rhyme or reason at all. And often no rhythm. At the very least the camera should follow the person around. There are really no exceptions to this rule, imho. I’m talking to YOU, Alisakiss.

A lot of times i get turned on just by watching people moving, and it almost doesn’t matter what they’re doing. There’s a show on the Playboy channel called “Hot Babes Doing Stuff Naked,” and i have to say that i think that show is kinda brilliant. Naturally, some things don’t really look sexy, no matter how hot the girl is while she does it, but i’d say a good 75% of what i’ve seen works for me. If it’s not actually a turn on, at least it’s amusing.

When it comes to sex in porn, it’s usually pretty boring after a while, mostly because it’s just so fake. Theres almost never any chemistry between the actors. I use the term “actors” here because since there’s no chemistry, they really are ACTING. I’ve seen a few exceptions to this, but the vast majority is just crap. I was looking at a photoset of two girls, and i was actually really turned on by how real it looked. I’ve always wondered if the photographer actually coached the models into those poses (as i’ve seen before, and it looked just as fake as it sounds), or if the girls were actually into each other and the photog just took pictures and only ever spoke up when he/she needed a particular shot. I’d like to believe the latter, as it looked like the girls in question had a lot of chemistry; i liked that. For this reason i also really dig the Crash Pad series. And, as exploitative as it is a lot of the time, Girls Gone Wild in SOME cases. With those at least the people are real.

More on this later. I’m still forming my thoughts on this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: